Status: OUT
Design reviews explicitly document TOCTOU and atomicity gaps as known divergences, and similar temporal check-gap patterns appear as systematic risks in the implementations (payment TOCTOU windows, notification rate-limit re-checks), suggesting the pedagogical approach may intentionally preserve documented gaps rather than preventing them.
Plan reviews identify the exact failure patterns that manifest in code, making the gaps intentional pedagogy rather than oversight
Depends on (SL): plan-review-documents-known-gaps, temporal-check-gaps-are-systematic-risk