{"id":"documented-gaps-manifest-as-implementation-risks","text":"Design reviews explicitly document TOCTOU and atomicity gaps as known divergences, and similar temporal check-gap patterns appear as systematic risks in the implementations (payment TOCTOU windows, notification rate-limit re-checks), suggesting the pedagogical approach may intentionally preserve documented gaps rather than preventing them.","truth_value":"OUT","source":"","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["plan-review-documents-known-gaps","temporal-check-gaps-are-systematic-risk"],"outlist":[],"label":"Plan reviews identify the exact failure patterns that manifest in code, making the gaps intentional pedagogy rather than oversight"}],"dependents":["temporal-correctness-gaps-are-known-and-accepted"],"metadata":{"last_reviewed":"2026-06-05T18:21:49","review_result":"invalid","_retracted":true},"created_at":"","updated_at":"2026-06-17T14:30:38+00:00","reviewed_at":"","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"2026-06-17T14:30:38+00:00","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"documented-gaps-manifest-as-implementation-risks","truth_value":"OUT","reason":"SL justification invalid","failed_antecedents":["temporal-check-gaps-are-systematic-risk"],"label":"Plan reviews identify the exact failure patterns that manifest in code, making the gaps intentional pedagogy rather than oversight"}]}}