{"id":"temporal-correctness-gaps-are-known-and-accepted","text":"Design reviews explicitly document temporal boundary risks (TOCTOU, atomicity), these same patterns appear as systematic implementation weaknesses clustering at check-act boundaries, and the implementations ship without fixing them — indicating the codebase treats temporal correctness gaps as documented, accepted limitations rather than bugs to resolve.","truth_value":"OUT","source":"","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["documented-gaps-manifest-as-implementation-risks","correctness-gaps-cluster-at-temporal-boundaries"],"outlist":[],"label":"the loop from documented risk to manifest implementation gap with no corrective action indicates conscious acceptance"}],"dependents":["correctness-profile-is-structurally-split","read-path-is-architectures-critical-surface","temporal-gaps-are-contained-by-forward-only-design"],"metadata":{"last_reviewed":"2026-06-05T18:21:49","review_result":"pass","_retracted":true},"created_at":"","updated_at":"2026-06-17T14:30:39+00:00","reviewed_at":"","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"2026-06-17T14:30:39+00:00","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"temporal-correctness-gaps-are-known-and-accepted","truth_value":"OUT","reason":"SL justification invalid","failed_antecedents":["documented-gaps-manifest-as-implementation-risks","correctness-gaps-cluster-at-temporal-boundaries"],"label":"the loop from documented risk to manifest implementation gap with no corrective action indicates conscious acceptance"}]}}