{"id":"lsp-validated-complete-interface-management","text":"LSP's behavioral contract framework serves as the correctness guarantee connecting the spatial and temporal dimensions of interface management: spatially, it validates that each level of the wrapping taxonomy (Proxy→Decorator→Strategy) maintains behavioral substitutability; temporally, both Bridge's proactive abstractions and Adapter's reactive adaptations depend on substitutability to preserve client transparency — making LSP a unifying constraint across the interface-management problem space.","truth_value":"IN","source":"","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["interface-management-complete-spatial-temporal","lsp-validates-wrapping-taxonomy"],"outlist":[],"label":"Depth-4 — connecting LSP's wrapping validation (depth-3) with complete spatial-temporal interface management (depth-3) extends LSP's correctness guarantee from one dimension to both"}],"dependents":["lsp-classification-transcendent-correctness"],"metadata":{"source_type":"derived","review_result":"invalid","repair_action":"softened"},"created_at":"2026-06-17T19:12:32+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","reviewed_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"lsp-validated-complete-interface-management","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["interface-management-complete-spatial-temporal","lsp-validates-wrapping-taxonomy"],"label":"Depth-4 — connecting LSP's wrapping validation (depth-3) with complete spatial-temporal interface management (depth-3) extends LSP's correctness guarantee from one dimension to both"},{"node":"interface-management-complete-spatial-temporal","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["bridge-adapter-temporal-interface-spectrum","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"label":"Two depth-2 conclusions addressing orthogonal dimensions of interface management (when vs how-deep) that have no shared ancestry — their combination reveals completeness across a 2D problem space"},{"node":"bridge-adapter-temporal-interface-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["bridge-separates-abstraction-from-implementation","adapter-bridges-design-boundaries"],"label":"Bridge's pre-design separation and Adapter's post-design reconciliation are complementary temporal strategies for the same problem (interface mismatch)"},{"node":"bridge-separates-abstraction-from-implementation","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"adapter-bridges-design-boundaries","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["adapter-after-design-bridge-before-design","dip-adapter-pattern-for-closed-components","adapter-class-vs-object-two-forms"],"label":"Adapter is the go-to pattern for post-design integration and DIP compliance"},{"node":"adapter-after-design-bridge-before-design","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"dip-adapter-pattern-for-closed-components","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"adapter-class-vs-object-two-forms","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum"],"label":"Two depth-1 wrapping spectrums (Proxy-Decorator and Decorator-Strategy) connect at Decorator to form a continuous access→skin→guts taxonomy"},{"node":"proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","decorator-transparent-enclosure"],"label":"Three base beliefs on wrapping semantics unify into a spectrum from dynamic enhancement to static access control"},{"node":"proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-transparent-enclosure","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing"],"label":"Three patterns form a spectrum from external wrapping to internal algorithm replacement"},{"node":"decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"lsp-validates-wrapping-taxonomy","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["lsp-contractual-completeness","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"label":"Every level of the Proxy→Decorator→Strategy wrapping depth axis relies on LSP's substitutability contracts"},{"node":"lsp-contractual-completeness","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["lsp-signature-rules-contravariant-covariant","lsp-preconditions-postconditions-invariants-rule","lsp-history-constraint-novel-contribution"],"label":"Three layers form a complete substitutability contract from syntactic to temporal"},{"node":"lsp-signature-rules-contravariant-covariant","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"lsp-preconditions-postconditions-invariants-rule","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"lsp-history-constraint-novel-contribution","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"}]}}