{"id":"interface-management-complete-spatial-temporal","text":"OO design provides substantial interface management coverage across both temporal and spatial dimensions: temporally, Bridge (anticipatory, before design solidifies) and Adapter (reactive, after independent design) together span the design lifecycle for interface coupling; spatially, the wrapping taxonomy (Proxy→Decorator→Strategy) progresses from access control through dynamic responsibility addition to algorithm replacement — together addressing a wide range of interface-management concerns.","truth_value":"IN","source":"","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["bridge-adapter-temporal-interface-spectrum","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"outlist":[],"label":"Two depth-2 conclusions addressing orthogonal dimensions of interface management (when vs how-deep) that have no shared ancestry — their combination reveals completeness across a 2D problem space"}],"dependents":["lsp-validated-complete-interface-management"],"metadata":{"source_type":"derived","review_result":"pass","repair_action":"softened"},"created_at":"2026-06-17T19:08:16+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","reviewed_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"interface-management-complete-spatial-temporal","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["bridge-adapter-temporal-interface-spectrum","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"label":"Two depth-2 conclusions addressing orthogonal dimensions of interface management (when vs how-deep) that have no shared ancestry — their combination reveals completeness across a 2D problem space"},{"node":"bridge-adapter-temporal-interface-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["bridge-separates-abstraction-from-implementation","adapter-bridges-design-boundaries"],"label":"Bridge's pre-design separation and Adapter's post-design reconciliation are complementary temporal strategies for the same problem (interface mismatch)"},{"node":"bridge-separates-abstraction-from-implementation","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"adapter-bridges-design-boundaries","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["adapter-after-design-bridge-before-design","dip-adapter-pattern-for-closed-components","adapter-class-vs-object-two-forms"],"label":"Adapter is the go-to pattern for post-design integration and DIP compliance"},{"node":"adapter-after-design-bridge-before-design","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"dip-adapter-pattern-for-closed-components","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"adapter-class-vs-object-two-forms","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum"],"label":"Two depth-1 wrapping spectrums (Proxy-Decorator and Decorator-Strategy) connect at Decorator to form a continuous access→skin→guts taxonomy"},{"node":"proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","decorator-transparent-enclosure"],"label":"Three base beliefs on wrapping semantics unify into a spectrum from dynamic enhancement to static access control"},{"node":"proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-transparent-enclosure","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing"],"label":"Three patterns form a spectrum from external wrapping to internal algorithm replacement"},{"node":"decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"}]}}