{"id":"decorator-confirmed-in-wrapping-taxonomy","text":"Decorator's independently established compositional niche (responsibility augmentation, differentiated from Adapter's interface conversion and Composite's hierarchy modeling) confirms its intermediate position in the wrapping taxonomy (between Proxy's access control and Strategy's algorithm substitution), validating that the wrapping depth axis captures genuine design distinctions not reducible to pattern categorization.","truth_value":"IN","source":"","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["decorator-distinct-compositional-niche","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"outlist":[],"label":"Depth-3 — Decorator's niche (depth-1) independently validates its position in the wrapping taxonomy (depth-2) via convergent evidence"}],"dependents":["decorator-niche-confirmed-but-operationally-bounded"],"metadata":{"source_type":"derived","review_result":"pass"},"created_at":"2026-06-17T23:07:32+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","reviewed_at":"2026-06-18T06:15:08+00:00","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"decorator-confirmed-in-wrapping-taxonomy","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["decorator-distinct-compositional-niche","wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm"],"label":"Depth-3 — Decorator's niche (depth-1) independently validates its position in the wrapping taxonomy (depth-2) via convergent evidence"},{"node":"decorator-distinct-compositional-niche","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["decorator-vs-adapter-responsibilities-not-interface","composite-vs-decorator-different-intents"],"label":"Depth-1 — triangulating Decorator's position from two differentiation axes (vs Adapter and vs Composite) identifies its unique niche in a way neither comparison alone does"},{"node":"decorator-vs-adapter-responsibilities-not-interface","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"composite-vs-decorator-different-intents","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"wrapping-taxonomy-access-to-algorithm","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum"],"label":"Two depth-1 wrapping spectrums (Proxy-Decorator and Decorator-Strategy) connect at Decorator to form a continuous access→skin→guts taxonomy"},{"node":"proxy-decorator-wrapping-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","decorator-transparent-enclosure"],"label":"Three base beliefs on wrapping semantics unify into a spectrum from dynamic enhancement to static access control"},{"node":"proxy-vs-decorator-static-vs-dynamic","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"decorator-transparent-enclosure","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"skin-vs-guts-extension-spectrum","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","decorator-dynamic-alternative-to-subclassing"],"label":"Three patterns form a spectrum from external wrapping to internal algorithm replacement"},{"node":"decorator-vs-strategy-skin-vs-guts","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"gof-template-method-vs-strategy-inheritance-vs-delegation","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"}]}}