Date: 2026-06-06
Time: 19:40
This file implements LeetCode problem 408 - Valid Word Abbreviation. It determines whether a given abbreviation string is a valid representation of a word, where digits in the abbreviation represent the count of characters they replace. For example, "i12iz4n" is a valid abbreviation of "internationalization" because i + 12 skipped chars + iz + 4 skipped chars + n reconstructs the full word.
The file is self-contained: it defines the solution function and its unit tests in one module, following the repo-wide convention of colocating implementation and tests.
validWordAbbreviation(word, abbr) -> boolThe sole public function. It walks both strings in lockstep using a two-pointer approach:
i: current position in wordj: current position in abbrWhen abbr[j] is a letter, it must match word[i] exactly. When abbr[j] is a digit, the function parses the full multi-digit number and advances i by that amount (skipping that many characters in word).
The function returns True only when both pointers reach the end of their respective strings simultaneously.
TestValidWordAbbreviation16 test cases covering:
"i12iz4n", full numeric "12", identity "word")"s010n", "01", "a0b")"sub4u4")Two-pointer string matching — the canonical approach for this problem. One pointer per input string, advanced at different rates depending on whether the current abbreviation character is a letter or digit.
Digit accumulation via Horner's method — num = num * 10 + int(abbr[j]) builds multi-digit numbers one character at a time without slicing or int() on a substring.
Self-contained module — solution + tests in one file, runnable via python -m unittest or python solution.py. This is the standard layout across the entire repo.
Imports: Only unittest from the standard library. No external dependencies.
Imported by: The testsolution.py file in the same directory. The massive "Imported By" list in the prompt is misleading — those are other problems' test files that import unittest, not this module. Only valid-word-abbreviation/testsolution.py actually imports from this file.
1. Initialize i = 0 (word pointer), j = 0 (abbr pointer).
2. Loop while both pointers are in bounds:
abbr[j] is a digit:'0' (leading zero).num.i by num (skip that many word characters).abbr[j] is a letter:word[i] to abbr[j]. Mismatch → return False.3. Return i == len(word) and j == len(abbr) — both must be fully consumed.
'0' is immediately rejected. This includes standalone '0' (which would mean "skip zero characters" — semantically meaningless and disallowed by the problem spec).word — no more, no less. The final i == len(word) and j == len(abbr) check enforces this.abbr[j].isdigit() ensures digit characters are always consumed as part of a number, never matched against word[i].There is none beyond returning False for invalid inputs. The function assumes both inputs are well-formed strings (lowercase letters for word, lowercase letters and digits for abbr). Out-of-bounds access is prevented by the loop guard i < len(word) and j < len(abbr), and the digit-parsing inner loop checks j < len(abbr).
valid-word-abbreviation/test_solution.py — The separate test file that imports this solution; may contain additional test cases beyond the inline onesvalid-word-abbreviation/plan.md — The planning document for this solution, likely discusses alternative approaches (regex, recursion)valid-word-abbreviation/review.md — Code review notes that may flag edge cases or complexity analysistwo-pointer-string-problems — Other solutions in this repo using the two-pointer pattern on strings (e.g., backspace-string-compare, long-pressed-name) for comparisonvalid-word-abbreviation/solution.py:validWordAbbreviation — Trace through with word="hi", abbr="2" and word="hi", abbr="3" to see how the over-skip case is caught by the final equality check rather than an explicit bounds checkleading-zero-rejection — Any numeric segment in abbr starting with '0' causes immediate False return, including the standalone digit 0exact-consumption-invariant — The function returns True only when both pointers i and j reach exactly the end of word and abbr respectively; partial consumption of either string is always Falseno-bounds-violation-on-overshoot — When a number in abbr exceeds the remaining length of word, i overshoots len(word) and the final i == len(word) check catches it without raising an IndexErrordigit-accumulation-is-greedy — Consecutive digits in abbr are always parsed as a single number (e.g., "12" means skip 12, not skip 1 then skip 2), which is enforced by the inner while loop consuming all adjacent digits