Date: 2026-06-06
Time: 19:28
thousand-separator/solution.pyThis file implements the solution for LeetCode 1556 — Thousand Separator. It formats a non-negative integer by inserting dots (.) every three digits from the right, mimicking locale-specific thousand separators (e.g., 1234567 → "1.234.567").
Solution.thousand_separator(self, n: int) -> str — the sole method. Takes a non-negative integer and returns its dot-separated string representation.
1. Convert n to its string form s.
2. Repeatedly chop 3-character chunks off the right end of s, appending each chunk to chunks.
3. Whatever remains (1–3 characters) becomes the final chunk — this is the leftmost group.
4. Reverse chunks (they were collected right-to-left) and join with ".".
For n = 1234567:
chunks = ["567"], s = "1234"chunks = ["567", "234"], s = "1"chunks = ["567", "234", "1"]"1.234.567"Right-to-left chunking via slicing — instead of using modular arithmetic or Python's format specifiers (f"{n:,}".replace(",", ".")), the solution manually partitions the string. This is a common pattern in LeetCode solutions that avoids reliance on locale or format-spec behavior to demonstrate the algorithm explicitly.
Imports: None — pure stdlib, no external dependencies.
Imported by: thousand-separator/test_solution.py (directly). The massive "Imported By" list in the prompt is likely an artifact of how the test harness resolves imports across the repo — those other test files don't actually import this solution; they share a common test runner infrastructure.
n is assumed non-negative (per the LeetCode constraint 0 <= n < 2^31). Negative numbers would produce "-xxx" with the minus sign stuck to the first chunk, which would be incorrect.len(s) > 3 is never true, so the result is just str(n) with no dots.None. The method trusts its caller to provide a valid non-negative integer. No type checking, no bounds validation — appropriate for a LeetCode submission where the problem constraints guarantee valid input.
thousand-separator/test_solution.py — See which edge cases (0, single-digit, exactly 3 digits, large values) the test suite coversthousand-separator/review.md — Read the code review notes for alternative approaches or identified issuesstring-chunking-patterns — Compare this right-to-left slicing approach with other chunking strategies used across the repo (e.g., divide-a-string-into-groups-of-size-k)thousand-separator/solution.py:thousand_separator — Benchmark against the one-liner f"{n:,}".replace(",", ".") to understand the tradeoff between explicitness and brevitythousand-separator-chunks-right-to-left — The while loop always removes exactly 3 characters per iteration from the right of the string, guaranteeing uniform chunk sizes except for the leftmost groupthousand-separator-no-dot-for-small — Inputs with 3 or fewer digits produce no dot in the output because the while-loop body never executesthousand-separator-negative-unsupported — The method produces incorrect output for negative integers (the minus sign would be glued to the first chunk) but this is acceptable given LeetCode's n >= 0 constraintthousand-separator-pure-string-ops — The solution uses only string slicing and list operations with no imports, format specifiers, or regex