Date: 2026-06-06
Time: 17:38
This file solves LeetCode 1614: Maximum Nesting Depth of the Parentheses. It determines the deepest level of nested parentheses in a valid parentheses string (VPS). The string may contain non-parenthesis characters, which are ignored.
Solution.maxDepth(self, s: str) -> intTakes a VPS string and returns the maximum nesting depth. Uses two integer accumulators:
depth — current nesting level, incremented on ( and decremented on ).max_depth — high-water mark, updated whenever depth exceeds it.Single-pass counter pattern. This is the canonical approach for parenthesis depth problems: maintain a running depth counter and track its peak. No stack is needed because the problem only asks for the *depth*, not the structure. This reduces space from O(n) (stack-based) to O(1).
The comparison if depth > maxdepth is used instead of maxdepth = max(max_depth, depth), avoiding a function call per character. Minor, but consistent with a pattern seen across this repo's solutions of preferring inline comparisons over max()/min() calls in tight loops.
Imports: None. Pure self-contained solution with no standard library or external dependencies.
Imported by: maximum-nesting-depth-of-the-parentheses/test_solution.py directly. The "Imported By" list in the prompt is misleading — those are all test files across the repo that share a common test harness import pattern, not actual consumers of this solution's logic.
1. Initialize depth and max_depth to 0.
2. Iterate character by character through s.
3. On (: increment depth, then check if it's a new maximum.
4. On ): decrement depth.
5. All other characters are ignored (the for loop simply skips them).
6. Return max_depth after the full scan.
For input "(1+(2*3)+((8)/4))+1":
( → depth=1, max=1
( → depth=2, max=2
) → depth=1
( → depth=2
( → depth=3, max=3
) → depth=2
) → depth=1
) → depth=0
→ returns 3
depth could go negative on malformed input, and the result would be silently wrong.depth is always non-negative (given valid input): every ) has a matching ( preceding it.max_depth >= 0 always holds: it starts at 0 and only increases.max_depth is updated immediately after incrementing depth, not at the end of the loop — this ensures the peak is captured even if subsequent ) characters bring depth back down.None. The method assumes valid input per the problem constraints. No exceptions are raised, no edge cases are guarded. An empty string returns 0 (correct), and a string with no parentheses also returns 0 (correct).
maximum-nesting-depth-of-the-parentheses/test_solution.py — See which edge cases are covered (empty string, no parens, deeply nested)valid-parentheses/solution.py — Stack-based approach for a problem that needs structure, not just depthremove-outermost-parentheses/solution.py — Same depth-counter pattern applied to a different parentheses problemcounter-vs-stack-parentheses — When a depth counter suffices vs. when you need a full stack (depth-only queries vs. matching/structure queries)max-depth-o1-space — maxDepth uses O(1) space: two integer counters, no stack or auxiliary data structuremax-depth-single-pass — maxDepth makes exactly one pass over the input string, O(n) timemax-depth-assumes-valid-input — maxDepth does not validate that parentheses are balanced; malformed input produces silently wrong resultsmax-depth-ignores-non-parens — Characters other than ( and ) are skipped with no processing