{"results":[{"id":"site-lacks-author-attribution","text":"llmeem.ai has no author, affiliation, or credentials listed anywhere on the site. Visitors cannot determine who ran the experiments or what their qualifications are.","truth_value":"IN","justification_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"challenges":[],"last_reviewed":null,"review_result":null,"source_type":""},{"id":"site-lacks-methodology-links","text":"llmeem.ai presents headline numbers (98.5% A/B across 3,853 questions, 88% vs 33% expert-vs-baseline, confidence r-values) without links to methodology, question sets, scoring rubrics, or raw result data. The numbers appear as unverified marketing claims.","truth_value":"IN","justification_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"challenges":[],"last_reviewed":null,"review_result":null,"source_type":""},{"id":"site-lacks-model-versions","text":"llmeem.ai does not specify which model versions (Sonnet, Opus, Haiku version numbers) or dates experiments were run against. Model version matters significantly for reproducibility.","truth_value":"IN","justification_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"challenges":[],"last_reviewed":null,"review_result":null,"source_type":""},{"id":"structure-not-truth-applies-to-site","text":"The expert.ftl2.com belief explorer demonstrates that TMS mechanics work (justification chains, IN/OUT propagation, retraction cascades) but does not prove the underlying claims are correct. A belief can be IN and fully justified within the system while being wrong, because all antecedents trace back to the same author's observations. Structure proves the tooling; external evidence proves the claims.","truth_value":"IN","justification_count":1,"dependent_count":0,"challenges":[],"last_reviewed":null,"review_result":null,"source_type":""}],"count":4,"limit":20,"offset":0}