{"id":"epistemic-honesty","text":"An epistemically honest EEM should distinguish between what it can demonstrate (structural consistency, self-correction, provenance tracking) and what it cannot demonstrate without external validation (absolute accuracy of numeric claims, generalizability to other implementations, superiority over alternatives). The TMS makes this distinction tractable by separating premises from derivations","truth_value":"IN","source":"repo:eem-expert/CLAUDE.md","source_url":"","source_hash":"","justifications":[{"type":"SL","antecedents":["structure-not-truth","premises-are-trust-boundaries"],"outlist":[],"label":""}],"dependents":[],"metadata":{},"created_at":"","updated_at":"","reviewed_at":"","verified_at":"","retracted_at":"","explanation":{"steps":[{"node":"epistemic-honesty","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["structure-not-truth","premises-are-trust-boundaries"],"label":""},{"node":"structure-not-truth","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["sl-justification"],"label":""},{"node":"sl-justification","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["ftl-reasons-is-tms"],"label":""},{"node":"ftl-reasons-is-tms","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["tms-doyle-1979"],"label":""},{"node":"tms-doyle-1979","truth_value":"IN","reason":"premise"},{"node":"premises-are-trust-boundaries","truth_value":"IN","reason":"SL justification valid","antecedents":["sl-justification","structure-not-truth"],"label":""}]}}